During the ongoing Vaucluse rape trial, psychiatrist Laurent Layet presented findings indicating that many accused individuals do not fit the profile of serial rapists, complicating the discourse on sexual violence. Despite two accused facing charges for possession of child pornography, Layet argued that their actions stemmed from specific circumstances rather than indicative of deviant tendencies. This has drawn skepticism from legal representatives, raising questions about the definitions of sexual abuse amid ongoing evaluations. The expert’s remarks suggest that the individuals involved may not be premeditated predators, but rather participants in a troubling scenario involving manipulation.